Ambient data fountain

How do you decide whether or not you should put on a coat before you leave your house in the morning? I like to open the door and step outside, but my wife likes to open the newspaper and read the forecast. Both of us are reading a display of the weather, but mine is implicit and hers is explicit. Weather is nice that way. It never goes down, and a quick peek out the window is often enough to tell you what you need to know. Other kinds of data aren’t typically available as implicit, or ambient, displays.

A Dutch artist named Koert van Mensvoort has taken on the problem of displaying currency exchange rates between yen, euros, and dollars as the dancing waters of a fountain.
As Koert puts it, “In the morning paper, I can read the weather report as well as the stock quotes. But when I look out of my window I only get a weather update and no stock exchange info. Could someone please fix this bug in my environmental system?” See the DATAFOUNTAIN website for pretty pictures and splashy sounds.

In the future, ambient interfaces will be so common you’ll be able to end awkward conversations with the plausible excuse “Sorry, but I’ve got a call coming in on this daffodil.”

Skype is a winner

James Fallows, the tech-savvy journalist normally seen over at the Atlantic, has a generally glowing review in the NY Times of the free internet phone service called Skype: Business > Your Money > Techno Files: In Internet Calling, Skype Is Living Up to the Hype” href=”http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/05/business/yourmoney/05tech.html”> In Internet Calling, Skype Is Living Up to the Hype. Free international high quality phone service… already downloaded 21 million times… and now on top of everything else, they have the stamp of legitimacy conferred by a rave review from the NY Times. If you have any stock in phone companies, sell it now.

In praise of tweaking

Last spring I wrote an article for interactions magazine, the official magazine of SIGCHI, the ACM’s Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction. My paper was about the MATLAB Online Programming Contest, which I’ve mentioned in this space a few times. You can’t get the article from the interactions website without an ACM membership, but my copyright release form allows me to put a copy here, which I’ve finally gotten around to doing. So here you go. As seen in the May/June 2004 issue of interactions, In Praise of Tweaking: A Wiki-like Programming Contest (PDF).

On first hearing how the Wikipedia site works, people are often scornful, incredulous, or simply dismissive. It can’t possibly work. How could it? Similarly, the MATLAB online programming contest is built upon an almost paradoxical premise: that a contest can be collaborative. Against all expectation, the back and forth drama of leaps and tweaks turns MATLAB programming into an entertaining spectator sport…

Smart playlists

For the past nine months or so, I have been the proud owner of an iPod. I have a few gripes about it, but by and large it’s been a good purchase. I spend more time using it to listen to books (hours long) than music (minutes long), so the controls that have to do with keeping my place in and moving me through great long recordings are very important to me. It’s truly maddening when your iPod forgets what “page” you were on and you have to spend five minutes zooming back and forth trying to remember where you were.

Be that as it may, iTunes has this feature called Smart Playlists that I somehow missed until last night. Smart Playlists are powerful filters that let you make playlists with rules rather than by handpicking songs one-by-one. For instance, you can say “play all the country music I have listened to exactly once in the last month” (which for me would be a very short playlist). This is a nice feature, but even more interesting is the fact that there is a whole website (Smart Playlists.com) dedicated to helping people share these playlists with one another. An entire website devoted to a feature that I didn’t even know existed. That’s impressive. I’d like to say someday that I designed a feature that inspired a website.

Viral marketing

Molecular biology is moving quickly from cartoons to pictures to movies. It used to be that the cell illustrations in biology textbooks were either blurry, grainy micrographs or fanciful, cartoonish diagrams. But pictures based on accurate knowledge of protein structure are becoming more common, and now we are moving into the realm of time with accurate movies of cellular phenomena. It’s a good time to be alive. The most entertaining recent movie short from the bacterial world is this terrific thriller from a lab at Purdue: “T4: the Tiny Terminator”. This animation is an accurate portrayal of the baseplate mechanism for a virus that attacks a bacterium. This is a film of what you would actually see if you could see things that can’t be seen. Here’s the page (look for the movie link in the upper left, or simply download it here): Virus makes its movie screen debut.

I’ve always thought the images of phage-like viruses attacking bacteria had a frightening, sinister aspect. Bacteriophages have these nasty buglike legs and bloated icosohedral bellies, and they squat on the bacterial membrane like pestilent, bloodhungry mosquitos and disgorge their lethal payload. Nevertheless they are, after all, simply a parcel of a few specialized molecules. Even so, this new animation, mesmerizing in the extreme, does nothing to dispel a palpable sense of malevolence. The great gift of modern molecular biology is that it can now begin to show mechanically how we are manifestations of the improbable molecules that make up viruses and cells. Are they sinister? Are we? If we are capable of evil, then so are they. Or, coming at it from the other direction, if we refuse to acknowledge their potential to be sinister, then we must deny ourselves that same privilege. We’re all playing the same game.

Corn on the cob

This is my daughter Carolyn going to town on a piece of corn. The picture was taken by Rob (a.k.a. the Coffee Czar). I posted this directly from Flickr as an experiment. Looks like it worked.

I’m pretty well sold on this idea of stitching together an online existence from a patchwork of well-tuned tools from places like Movable Type, Flickr, and Bloglines.

Want a Gmail address?

Send me an email if you want a Gmail account. I’ve got one to give away, and the first person to send me a note (to gulley@gmail.com, naturally) is welcome to it. [NOTE: I’ve given away my last Gmail account] I’ve been very happy with it so far. They have redesigned the flow of filing email in a way that is likely to become the norm going forward. Actually, I have no idea if this invention was theirs to begin with (maybe it’s another Xerox PARC fumble), but the key innovation is that you just archive everything and then you search for what you need later. No agonizing over whether you should file it carefully or throw it away… just file it. If you need it, it shouldn’t be too hard to find it again. It’s not perfect, but it’s loads better than Hotmail.

Plus, if you get your account now, you might just snag your favorite username. I did.

Perpetual novelty

One of the problems that has faced the aimless web surfer since the web came into being is this one: where do you start? You have a little time, and you have a vague desire to see something new and cool. What then? Back at the beginning, there was the NCSA What’s New list maintained on the UIUC web site (wherein you can even see the original Star Chamber link there from 1996). But the web kept getting bigger and more tangled, “cool sites of the day” generally weren’t, and it was hard to know which way to turn.

Blogs and RSS feeds have changed all that. Using Bloglines and del.icio.us, I feel confident that I can get on the computer at any time night or day and find limitless amounts of stuff that fascinates, amuses, and disturbs. Limitless amounts of high quality, interesting content. It’s almost disturbing, like driving way too fast. For instance, here’s a gem I found on del.icio.us a few days ago. For the love of God, don’t follow the link: WEBoggle. It’s a simple word game, but it’ll suck the time of day right out of you if you don’t tie yourself to the mast and keep on sailing.

It was in this spirit of bewildering richness that I created the page Signal2Noise several years ago.

The problem isn’t noise
The problem is signal
Take away the idiots
You’ll be plagued by the clever.

A problem worth having, but bewildering all the same.

Mobissimo = travel Google

The era of the travel agent is nearing its end. If you fly much, you’re probably used to using Orbitz or Expedia by now. Maybe you still check in with a travel agent just to make sure you’re not missing a better deal, because after all, Orbitz and Expedia are looking for your business. So they won’t refer you to a site that won’t earn them a little something on the side. But suppose there were a site like Google (or Froogle, to be more precise) that just pointed the way to the best possible deal and then stepped out of the way. There would no longer be a conflict of interest regarding the real rock-bottom flights about there. That’s the idea behind Mobissimo.
As an article on azcentral.com put it:

The new sites aim to address what they see as shortcomings of the major online travel agents. For example, most of the fast-growing discount airlines like JetBlue and Southwest Airlines don’t show up on the big travel sites at all. Other discount carriers like Spirit Airlines sometimes offer promotional fares only via their own sites.

Mobissimo also recently won the coveted President-with-the-Coolest-Name award for its CEO Svetlozar Nestorov.

Incidentally, as I learned in this MSNBC article, buying a package flight-and-lodging deal might keep you coming back to the major sites regardless of innovations like Mobissimo. Package deals allow hotel owners, for example, to move expiring rooms at shockingly low rates and then hide their desperation by pairing the travel with the lodging. Nobody wants to stay at a desperate hotel, but everybody wants a good deal.

Dogs in jail

Saw this on the newstand yesterday in Smithsonian magazine. It was the most heart-warming thing I’ve read in a long time: let prison inmates train seeing-eye dogs. The training is intensive and extremely expensive (if you don’t have prisoners do it for you). At the same time, the inmates are cynical, detached, and hardened to just about anything that humans can throw at them. But working with dogs cuts right through that. It’s a great story about people helping dogs and dogs helping people. Only a few paragraphs of the story are available as HTML (New Leash on Life) but you can read the whole thing here as a PDF file.